| 
    Sujeong Shin1, Yun-Mi Song1, Hyeonyoung Ko1, Yoon-Ho Choi2, Woo Yong Lee2, Son Mi Chung2,
Sunyoung Park1, Insub Kim1, Jinyoung Shin3
 1Department of Family Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine,
Seoul, Korea
2Center for Health Promotion, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine,
Seoul, Korea
3Department of Family Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
 
 
 Background: Based on scientific evidence, the Korean 
National Health Examination recommends age 40 as an
appropriate time for screening. However, awareness of the 
health examination itself or of the appropriate age
for screening has not been discussed extensively with 
examinees. This study aims to evaluate the perception
about age at the start and end of periodic health 
examinations (PHE).
 Methods: A self-administered survey was completed by 887 
subjects who visited either the health promotion
center or the outpatient clinic at a university hospital in Korea 
between February 15 and May 18, 2016.
Participants were divided into two groups: 587 were periodic 
health examinees, and 300 were visitors to the
family medicine clinic. Their awareness of PHE was 
compared using the Chi-square test and multiple logistic
regression.
 Results: Both groups had similar (P>0.05) perceptions 
regarding the awareness, knowledge and usefulness of
the PHE. Both groups preferred to continue taking a PHE 
with no upper limit on the age when it could be taken.
This tendency was more prominent among subjects with 
higher levels of education and household income. In
both groups with individuals under age 50 said that the 
appropriate age to begin screening is 40 or younger.
 Conclusions: The perception regarding the ages at which to 
start and end the PHE was confirmed according to
the subject of visit; a wider range of appropriate ages was 
preferred than is included in the current recommendations.
 Korean J Health Promot 2017;17(3):161-167
 
 Keywords: Health service, Age factors, Socioeconomic 
factors
 |