Han Yuan1, Maeng-Kyu Kim1,2,3
1 Department of Physical Education, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
2 Department of Physical Education, Kyungpook National University College of Education, Daegu, Korea
3 Sports Science Research Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
http://dx.doi.org/10.15384/kjhp.2023.23.2.75
Korean J Health Promot 2023;23(2):75-84
º» ÇмúÁö 23±Ç 2È£¿¡ °ÔÀçµÈ À§ ³í¹®¿¡ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°ÀÌ ¿À·ù°¡ ÀÖ
¾î Á¤Á¤ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
1. Figure 1. »çÁø ÆÄÀÏ ¿À·ù
Before correction
Figure 1. The path model in this study (n=61). The model¡¯s fit
showed a perfect fit to the data based on the results
(¥ö 2=1.22, df=4, RMR=0.016, RMSEA¡Â0.001, GFI=0.993,
AGFI=0.965, NFI=0.988, CFI=1.00). The model¡¯s fit
showed a perfect fit to the data based on the results
(¥ö2=1.22, df=4, RMR=0.016, RMSEA¡Â0.001, GFI=0.993,
AGFI=0.965, NFI=0.988, CFI=1.00). df, degree of freedom;
RMR, root mean square residual; RMSEA, root
mean square error of approximation; GFI, goodness-of-fit
index; AGFI, adjusted goodness-of-fit index; NFI,
normed fit index; CFI, comparative fit index; AMOS, analysis
of moment structures. aAll values indicate stand-
ardized coefficients using AMOS with maximum likelihood
estimation obtained by the path analysis. bP<0.05.
After correction
Figure 1 . Flow chart of inclusion and exclusion of the study
participants. |