Hyewon Chung1
, Yoon Hwan Oh1,2, Ji Hyun Moon1,2, Hyeon Ju Kim1,2, Mi Hee Kong1,2
1
Department of Family Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea
2
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea
Background: Studies have reported that reduced autonomic
nervous system activity could result in a suboptimal health
condition and various diseases, further increasing the
mortality rate. The present study aimed to
determine the difference in risk factors for metabolic and
cardiovascular diseases in patients with reduced or
unstable autonomic activity according to heart rate variability
test results.
Methods: We recorded blood pressure, physical
measurements (body mass index and waist circumference),
fasting blood glucose, and blood lipid status. Indicators
representative of autonomic nerve functionality (total
power [TP], standard deviation of the normal-to-normal
intervals [SDNN], low-frequency band [LF], high-frequency
band [HF]) were measured using a 5-minute heart rate
variability test. Each indicator was divided into
quartiles.
Results: In men, the risk of abdominal obesity was high in
the group with a low TP. In the group with a low SDNN,
TP, and LF, the risk of a blood pressure increase was high.
When LH and HF were low, there was a high risk of
increased fasting blood sugar, whereas when LH was low,
there was a high risk of hypertriglyceridemia. Women
with SDNN loss had higher odds ratios for abdominal obesity
and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia.
Conclusions: These results indicate a higher risk of having
risk factors for metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, such
as abdominal obesity, elevated blood pressure,
hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and low
high-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia in a group with
reduced autonomic activity measured by heart rate
variability. Women with a low SDNN had a 4.51-fold higher
risk of abdominal obesity than women with a high
SDNN, showing the greatest value of the heart rate variability
indices.
Korean J Health Promot 2020;20(2):41-48 |